The defendant, who testified against the system vendor, testified that the section 12 law was evidence of a contract specific performance document to verify the evidence (10 of 1984), documents 17 and 79. Was fake and did not receive their foreword. Considering that he did not sign the document and the plaintiff was in unlawful possession of the suit land a minor witness and sermon were presented to prove a document but other minor evidence was not presented which led to the Appellate Court. Had excluded the case that a witness was not presented and that only one certified witness was not sufficient to prove the document. The legitimate claimants were bound, under Article 79 of the Law Evidence Order, 1984, This can be followed to prove the execution of the sale agreement by presenting two minor witnesses. Become a competent witness and change the need to present extraordinary testimony if parties execute and sign the document in the presence of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
