Find a Lawyer

MST. NASEEM AFZAL versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI FOR 5 OTHERS---RESPONDENTS

Article 199 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 126 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court jurisdiction guaranteed son Son was selected to enter the BSc engineering course at the Engineering College at Government expense Was chosen at the time of He said that the bail bond was implemented by the applicant and her husband if the applicant's son / son resigns during training or after completing his engineering education services of his commission. The applicant will pay on demand if he resigns within 13 years. The applicant's trainee / son was sent to Pakistan Military Academy for one year after completing his studies, but was dismissed from the academy on some charges and subsequently applied. And her husband needed to pay bail. In order to release the BCC Engineering Degree obtained by these son Petitioners as a precondition for the amount ordered in the Constitution, the challenge of retaining the constitutional petition was challenged by the authorities on the basis of an individual in the constitutional petition. I cannot be ordered to act as a member of any Armed Forces or in connection with a person subject to such law. Although the applicant's son's endorsement was subject to the Pakistan Military Academy Army rules, he did not have any duty in the matter as a gentleman denied civil responsibility by the applicant as a cadet constitutional guarantee. Revolves around On a bond of guarantee, registration advocate from Battagram lawyer