Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ versus STATE

Section 392 The testimony of the evidence The head constable of the police station, who was on duty near the scene, when some of the suspects chased after the accused, also fled after committing the robbery and also succeeded in pursuing the accused. The head constable also served as a consultant. No arrests were made between the accused and the prosecution witnesses for the arrest and recovery, nor did any disclosure of false accusation be disclosed; it would not be fatal for the prosecutor to unseal the complainant. The other complainant, who was also an employee of the concerned institution, was acquitted of the complainant. A private person acting as conscience of arrest and recovery, also disposed of section 103, CR PC non-compliance, evidence was brought on record to prove his guilt, trial court accused Sentenced and sentenced tax advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer