LUQMAN RAJI ADEWUNMI versus STATE
The denial of the question raised about the identity of the accused by means of Sec. 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) bail, passport and other documents will require a deep appreciation of the evidence. The accused's wife could not be better considered by the trial court during the trial, on this point, and the affidavit could not be self-guaranteed in the absence of a private and independent witness. Was not, especially when it was said that efforts were made to get the individual out of the public, but they did not comply with Section 17373, CRPC. Refused to delay invoice submission within the stipulated period, though it was acceptable as a ground for bail, but could not be accepted when sufficient to link the accused to a 7kg possession offense. The evidence was there. Request for heroin bail dismissed by competent suspect dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Chaman lawyer
