Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus THE STATE

Section 2?2 (b), 4 36 evidence and 4 364 in this case an FIR of appreciation of the evidence was filed with a three-day indefinite period which was not receiving support from an independent source for presentation, The defendant's confessional statement was recorded 13 days after his arrest, for which no plausible explanation exists on the subsequent record that the investigating officer had treated the accused as a judicial magistrate had committed torture on the body of the accused himself. The marks were noted as such fact indicated that the accused's confession statement was not made voluntarily and in practice There was no evidence against the accused in the affair, the complainant's evidence was neither independently endorsed nor supported, the trial judge was unaware of the law. And had no legal view on writing this decision, which was full of material legal errors. The defendant was not convicted of sentencing as a trial judge, in order to keep the defense evidence in the Republican position with the evidence of the failed prosecutor and with no poetry or reason dismissed the defense version, in this case His Holiness was terminated because its contents were not acknowledged by any independent evidence, except that the so-called judicial confession be recorded. 13 days after the arrest of the accused, evidence of his recovery was completely cleared, the trial is fraught with weaknesses, instability, weaknesses, apparent contradictions and conflicts between disputes and the contents of the FIR. , The whole affair advocate from Upper Deval lawyer