Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SOOMAR CHANDIO versus INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL POLICE OFFICE, SINDH, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS

RR3 and 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), the major punishment for forfeiting the service passed for section 4, two years after the appellant appealed for two years to issue him a show cause notice. It was reported that he had submitted the request. His transfer from Sindh Reserve Police to regular police, directly to the Secretary of Interior, violating the rules. The appellant's name was not included in the police officers who were exchanged with Sindh Reserve Police in accordance with the regular police policy, it started submitting petitions to the concerned authorities. For such a better future prospect, the appellant failed to resolve his complaint for such a transfer, as a final resort was contacted by the final authority, ie, the Home Secretary's Service Condition Rules, in full on the Appellants. Applicable to, he is a civil servant, he should be witnessed according to letter and spirit. Appellant certainly had violated the rules in submitting / appealing the application to the higher authority. However, the direct appellant's act could fall into the category of mere irregularity and not dial the amount of public misconduct. And no offense was intended by the appellant to maintain a 14 year base service record and in the first place the interim award was given by the appellant. The sentence was severe and did not agree with the error committed by it, handling the appellant's fault / interruption case. After being taken, the sentence he received was amended. One year without a cumulative effect property advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer