Find a Lawyer

DR. ASIF JAN versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER

Rr 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5, 6 and 7 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), was removed from the section 4 service as appellant service tribunal medico legal officer because of the allegation. He was removed from the job. An incorrect and fabricated medical certificate was issued by the appellant in connection with the injury to the medical examiner who stated that the serious allegation was denied by the appellant; Ordering an inquiry, but instead adopting a shortcut methodology that was neither valid nor sustained, for an appropriate and legal course that was issued by the appellant. The certificate issued was invalid and fabricated because after two and a half months of the incident, the controversial injury investigation There is an injury to the house. Appellant was not allowed to attend the medical board meeting to explain his position and was not confirmed by the medical board. A copy of this report was presented to the appellant, either with the showcase notice or the final showcase notice violating the principles of natural justice and depriving the appellant of his right to defend himself, Otherwise, the dismissal order against the appellant by the unqualified authority was set aside and the appellant was ordered to be reinstated. famous lower court advocate from More kunda lawyer