AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section (c) accused of appreciating the evidence is accused of the prosecution's witness making a judicial confession by the accused, the accused was not presented during his examination under Section 2342, CRPC said Evidence against the accused could not be considered for the purpose of recording of the crime, especially when the necessary supplies for the purpose of recording the judicial confession were not fulfilled, the testimony of the prosecutor before whom the accused committed the criminal confession himself. He was involved as an accused and has already been released after recording a judicial confession with the intention of the accused. There was no independent evidence to prove that the British port was involved in any way in the export or transportation of the prohibited material exported from the prosecution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mardan lawyer