The delay in filing the FIR was not satisfactorily explained by the section 302 (b) evidence, and the accused could benefit from the delay in reporting every possibility of dispute and false judgment and positive Presence cannot be more important. Evidence of reliable prosecution, but it would be important in the absence of such evidence despite the fact that the shops were open at the time of the events that were witnessed by many, no independent evidence was presented by the prosecution. The accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
