Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADOOS versus STATE

Identifying the Section 9 (C) Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 7 allegations, the defendants did not deny the recovery of opium, and witnesses of the same recovery pointed out that the drug recovery against the accused was false. The accused had no prejudice. It was, therefore, proved, however, that the trial court, upon receipt of a request for the accused to be underage, was obliged to submit it to the Medical Board under section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000. Get the report and it has passed the appropriate order. After an inquiry, it was observed that the accused appeared to be important in the proceeding. On the contrary, the sentence of the offender was retained but his sentence of six years imprisonment \ RI was reduced to five years under circumstances. The remand was obtained by the Tuition Court to comply with the provisions of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, and after an inquiry as to whether the suspect was found. At the time of the commission of the crime, all subsequent benefits should be extended to the App. list of supreme court advocates from Dhirkot lawyer