HASLAN versus STATE
The extra-judicial confession of the accused guilty of section 2 (c) evidence was substantiated by the record that the victim did not purse and fired at the victim's house at midnight. This led to his death saying that it was reasonably possible that he had given the accused the right to personal defense of life and property, who, using that right, considered a thief in the dark at night. A bullet was fired on the way, which proved to be a life-threatening charge. No offense was exceeded, the prosecution failed to prove Qutel Um's charge. I was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Dargai lawyer
