The application for a Section 24 transfer petition alleges that counsel counsel for the applicants expected the applicants that they would not be able to obtain justice from the presiding officer of the court concerned and to move the appeal for transfer of appeal. Advising that the lawyer had not filed an affidavit. In this regard, it is unfortunate that a lawyer advised his client to transfer the case to the High Court, which led to his arrest that the Judicial Officer would not impartially decide the case. And a fair lawyer should have the moral courage to submit an affidavit. His suggestion and support for state reasons for his arrest were central to the appellate court's reader's request for a transfer of the case where the appeals are pending. The preliminary inquiry was already ordered in this regard. No charges were found where the appeals were pending. A scenario of a situation that arose during the time of use for the transfer of the case, it would be in the interest of the justice as well as the parties who transferred the case to another judge.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
