Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF BANGASH versus A.S.P., KOHAT

Section 114 and O XLVII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Review Review can be made on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after due diligence, was not in the knowledge of the reviewer. Or when the decree was approved, it could not be submitted. Or an order was made; or for any error or omission before the record, or for any good reason which was taken up for review by the applicant in the present case, was to represent them in the constitutional petition. 'S lawyer, without his direction, had left. On any basis that cannot be reviewed by an unwanted decision / order, when nothing was in the request for review, it could be remotely suggested that the applicant's lawyer filed a tile with the court. During the withdrawal of the constitutional application with permission of Case's case, any fraud consideration was influenced or endorsed by him. Although on the other hand it was said with the applicant that the withdrawal of the constitutional petition was without his direction, the lawyer implemented it through which the lawyer engaged in the request for his constitutional petition. The process was, the lawyer was given the option to withdraw the constitutional petition, which is to represent the applicants. The constitutional petition has the power to completely withdraw the Constitution. After that, their statement in relation to their withdrawal is binding. Was pakistani advocates Dera Ismail Khan lawyer