NAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
The complainant and the prosecution witness gave a consistent account of the incident, and they agreed on the key details of the incident such as the date, time, location and manner of the incident and There was no serious challenge from the accused. Regarding their testimony, although being interdependent brother to each other, it was not enough to see their testimony with suspicion that the presence of eyewitnesses at the relevant time was completely in place. Stood for no reason. Suspect these witnesses, even though they were not residents of the scene, but because of their presence, stood up comfortably and said that the testimony of the witnesses affected their faith.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ali Chak lawyer
