Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus OLIVES CATERING


Question 13 from the Section 13 (1) (AA) and 136 Appellate Maintenance Law Officer was added due to an unknown investment but the income declared by the Assisi was increased by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Partially maintained The authorities were that the appellate authorities were not justified in excluding the addition made under section 13 (1) (a) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. The Validity Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found that the appellate authority dismissed the entire increase on the basis of general observations. The appellate authority's tribunal's theory neither considered credibility nor offered any explanation to the authority, so the increase was restored to the extent that it could not be established about the law. No question was raised or it was not observed. Whether the record cooperates or not, the tribunal came to a conclusion that was against Rico. The High Court refused to stop the question from the heart.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.