Find a Lawyer

SARDAR BIBI versus ABDUL AZIZ AND 15 OTHERS

A. XLI, R 27 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 85 (3) Additional evidence certified copies of public records These acknowledged documents were public documents that were admissible in evidence, and were presented without proof. ? Partial evidence by the defendants While the defendants were not present before the court, the lawsuit against the former parliament has been claimed that such documents cannot be reproduced through surveillance, but it has remained part of the record. , While the defendants were in the position. That these documents cannot be considered in any way and the basis of the decision has been laid. The defendants referred to the Appellate Court under O.L.I., R. 27, CPC, but the appellate court took the view that these documents are already on the record of the trial court. Seeing these documents as part of the evidence, their application for additional evidence was rejected and the decree sought for them was granted. jobs for advocates from Kazi Ahmed lawyer