Find a Lawyer

NOOR DIN versus INAYAT ULLAH

Section 13 (1) and (2) of the Tal Q Talbi i Composition Plaintiff alleged that he had learned of the sale under question 5 199 1991, two months and sixteen days after the execution of the sale. And that same day he had to leave immediately. Plaintiffs did not endorse oral evidence of such a statement, the plaintiff's general attorney stated that they obtained knowledge of the sale 4-10 days after the sale, which the plaintiff's effect was earlier than the date mentioned in the claimant. Failure to prove the evidence was imposed and, therefore, the case was dismissed before the plaintiff's right under section 13, Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, for non-compulsion of the student. immigration advocates email from Nankana Sahib lawyer