ADIL FAHEEM RIZVI versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 409/420/467/468/471/109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Guarantee, the delivery of further inquiry bills It appears that the wheat was not denied in question by the accused, which was disclosed by the employees of the Food Prosecution Department and did not collect any evidence in which the alleged crime or any accused or conspiracy was not disclosed. The accused was booked against the accused for false and fraudulent preparation of the bills. The Investigation Officer found the accused innocent and the accused's case was further investigated as he claimed to have lost / misused the quantity of wheat. Was mentioned, it was contradictory. The accused was arrested in FI and sent to a judicial lockup after being involved in a police inquiry. If the result is a final sentence in any case, then the accused faces punishment. Will In the case of the case, the bail was entered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Daud Khel lawyer
