SHAHID JAMEEL versus SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, FAISALABAD
Sections 6, 7 and 23 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/395/396/412 for the transfer of a case from the Anti-Terrorist Court to the General Court concerning the robber with the murder against the applicants / accused. Has been admitted to The purpose of private benefits and the crimes under question relating to maintaining stolen property were not considered to be `` designed or intended to violate Section 6 (1) (b) or (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 ''). Was considered by the provisions. No defendant was charged with the manslaughter referred to in section 6 (1) (b) or (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, then the special court constituted under the aforesaid Act, There was no jurisdiction to hear. The case against the accused was clearly missing in the lawsuit so that he and his co-accused could be prosecuted for terrorism.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
