MST. PIARI JAN THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY AND ANOTHER versus HUKAM DAD
Revision non-review The application for revival disclosure for illegal prosecution was filed at a regular hearing but an advocate representing the reviewing applicant resigned at the bench, petitioner from another lawyer. Engaged, anyone who was critically ill and riding on a bed, no one was scheduled to set a date, the hearing for a review petition was dismissed for illegal prosecution. The request for a review of the legality which was entered at the regular hearing could not be excluded because of the prosecution, there was no evidence in the circumstances of the case that the applicant had a notice of expulsion. In any other case, the petitioner's request for a revision of his review request for not prosecuting them before issuing the notice was allowed and the request was restored to its original number.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
