Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABAIDULLAH versus SESSIONS JUDGE, JHANG


Section 302 was formed with the consent of the parties determining the age of the accused medical board established under the orders of the Section 7 Trial Court, XVII of 2000 (XXII of 2000), which consisted of five doctors, including a radiologist. The age of the accused was 21 years to 22 years. According to the medical report, the age of the accused was between 19/20 years in the date of the incident and even if one year's margin was given then it was discovered between 18/19 years. The Sessions Court affidavit affirmed the entries in the berth register of the accused and consequently the accused was declared to be above 18 years of age.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.