Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABAIDULLAH versus SESSIONS JUDGE, JHANG


Section 302 was formed with the consent of the parties determining the age of the accused medical board established under the orders of the Section 7 Trial Court, XVII of 2000 (XXII of 2000), which consisted of five doctors, including a radiologist. The age of the accused was 21 years to 22 years. According to the medical report, the age of the accused was between 19/20 years in the date of the incident and even if one year's margin was given then it was discovered between 18/19 years. The Sessions Court affidavit affirmed the entries in the berth register of the accused and consequently the accused was declared to be above 18 years of age.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Gilgit lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.