SHAUKAT ALI ALIAS SHAUKAT HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD HANIF
Section 12 of the evidence (10 of 1984), for the specific performance of the Articles 78 and 79 suit document sale agreement, proved the evidence of the signatures by the trial court pursuant to the sale and transfer of assets. It was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to collect the balance, the appeal court upheld by the trial court on the ground that the order to collect the balance amount was a conditional order to the issuance of a temporary injunction , Nor was it a prerequisite for the performance of the contract, nor could the basis of its decision be made. The advance payment was proved. The appellate court accepted the appeal and proved its decision as a result of not submitting the remaining amount. I was on leave of interim order. Checking evidence, considering the base would not affect the legality of the execution of the contract, and the delivery of the occupation ial the court was not challenged in the cross-objections The contract signatures were acknowledged A witness and author hanged It was sufficient to prove that the appellate court's decision was affirmed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
