Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus ABDUL REHMAN

Sections 12 and 27 (b) of Conan Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 133 for the specific performance of the contract of sale, without notice of the plaintiff in advance of the plaintiff's decision in the decision of the suit by the suit trial Claim to the Price Receiver as a Worth Buyer The appellate court did not challenge the verdict by the vendor after which the appellate court or the High Court did not approve the seller's change of entry in favor of the seller. Went and the seller challenged its authenticity in the case that is still pending. The valid agreement between the seller and the plaintiff's statements and the witness who knew his subsequent vendor's knowledge of the plaintiff's contract will be deemed to have been accepted for non-scrutiny by him. Was. The High Court dismissed the circumstances revision request \ r \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD NOMAN BUTT v. CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD, LAHORE 2013 CLC 21
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN alias AKHTAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 23
• Rana KHALIL AHMAD v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-II), BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE 2013 PLD 23
• MUHAMMAD ADNAN (MUHAMMAD IRFAN) v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE HAFIZABAD 2013 CLD 25
• NOOR v. Mst. SATTAN 2013 PLD 30
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2013 MLD 31
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. State 2013 YLR 34
• NISHAT CHUNIAN LTD. v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Local Government 2013 CLC 34

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

lawer from fb area from Nooriabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes