Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD ALIAS NASRO versus THE STATE

Section 7 377 Testimony of Evidence The trial court sentenced the accused with medical evidence based on the statement of the alleged victim, the alleged victim was not a true witness as he himself confessed that he had instructed his father But the accused was falsely involved, the prosecution's second witness was not credible witness because he gave a specific date when he was allegedly abducted by the victim, but that date was his own. Medical evidence was different from the victim, medical evidence did not link the suspect to the surgery because the medical officer stated that it was unclear. Did not say The sodomy was allegedly committed to the victim criminal advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer