JAFFAR ALI KHAN DURANI versus THE STATE
Definition of Section 10 (3) Evidence. The Victim woman reported the matter to the police the day after the incident and her statement did not provide an affiliate affiliate with the commission before the trial to prove the accused's guilt, before repeating her statement. Yes. On the basis of which the FIR was allegedly told by eyewitnesses that he could not say if the accused in the court had not done so because of the darkness of the same night, the witness confessed wholeheartedly. What was that he couldn't identify it. At the scene of the incident when the accused was facing his back while the accused was fleeing from the scene of the crime, both the prosecution's witnesses stated that the complainant / victim's child was present at the time of the incident, but among them No one was offered to support the version. The prosecution's case, under the circumstances, was not free of any doubt
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Toru lawyer
