Sections 20 and 24 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 412 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 28 (c) and 29 (1) (2) of the Federal The Shariat Court of Appeal before the Competition Court, although prosecuting this ordinance under Article 24 (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance, 1979, under Priviso One, punished the offender under a different law, under different offenses. Was eligible, if the evidence showed it and the verdict could be presented to the Federal Shariah Court, but in the present case since the charge with the provisions of the Ordinance under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 The verdict was also announced. The trial court, as the Judge of the Anti-Terrorism Court, will not lie to the Federal Shariat Court in view of section 25 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, appeal against the unwarranted decision, under which the final decision of the Anti-Terrorism Court is only appealed. Can only be taken In front of the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
