Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIR versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) of the evidence was complained of hostility between the parties and the other four witnesses who were related to the deceased were located several miles away from the spot which occurred during a winter night under the moonlight. The complaining party could not. Observe a situation that probably occurred within an acre of the acreage in a wheat field, the investigating officer chose to retrieve witnesses instead of attaching the local respected witnesses to the recovery process. There was animosity toward the recovery. It turned out that the empty cartridges that were placed on the accused during the trial did not match the gun on the accused. Medical evidence did not in any way link the accused to the commission of the crime. The accused was acquitted. jobs for advocates from Tall lawyer