MUSTAHSAM MAHMOOD versus STATE
The testimony of Articles 2 & 39 & 4 4re testimony was not a prior hostility to the witnesses of the incident and their relationship with the deceased would not make their testimony untrustworthy as it was unreliable that the eyewitnesses were genuine. Allow criminals to be falsely implicated in litigation. The forensic science laboratory reports that the empty pistols of the crime were not found to be married, but since the recovery of the weapon of crime is merely a contentious piece of evidence, it would not matter if a weapon of crime was recovered at all. Eyewitnesses were subjected to lengthy investigations if they were not tied to empty cases of recovered crime, but they were not killed, in which case Ocular's account was fully covered by medical evidence. Was confirmed that the defendant's version of defense did not inspire trust The witness will not have any adverse effect on the prosecution's story because it was not close, for the prosecution to examine all the witnesses at the trial, Surrey blamed the defendant on the evidence available on the record, But, as stated under Section 304, the culprit was responsible for the murder. The accused's conviction in the case was changed from section 302 (a) to section 302 (b), after the PPC sentenced him to death by a trial court and sentenced him to two cases positively. went.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Larkana lawyer