Find a Lawyer

CHAUDHRY AHMAD NAWAZ versus SUPERINTENDENT CUSTOMS, ANTI-SMUGGLING ORGANIZATION, MIANWALI

Sections 16, 168 and 193 dispersing the vehicle on suspicion that it was a smuggled item After the appeal the initial investigative vehicle was sent to the forensic science laboratory which stated that the chassis had been tampered with. The appellant could not produce the proprietary documents, in terms of section 168 of the Custody Act, 1969, depending on the affidavit given by the deputy collector of the said act, the result was Upon arriving, the vehicle has been hit by a crash and no tampering with chassis number has been made. No breach of any of the Customs Act, 1969 was made, it was made the Collector of Customs and Central Intelligence, the order of the Deputy Collector was challenged in the appeal which allowed the customs, excise and sales tax. The appellate tribunal held that the results related to the harmony of the two forensics were found. Laboratories / reports could not be disputed, resulting in the chase number of the vehicle being tampered with. The appellant never challenged the overwhelming information of Franz Science Laboratories for which an unwanted order was passed. The oath given by a private person cannot deny the discovery of a scientific laboratory for which any question Has not been raised which may be capable of interfering with the appeal, the appeal was not enforceable. r \ n law firms from Toru lawyer