AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER versus ALLAH DITTA
Section 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VIII, R6 Not claiming jurisdiction of the banking tribunal, the direction of the extra refund was dealt with by the banking tribunal as the plaintiff tribunal had paid the total liability. The defendants paid excessive amounts, therefore, the bank was instructed that the surplus that the bank returned was that, under the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984, the tribunal had no jurisdiction, Nor did the defendant claim a seat. The Banking Tribunal has no such jurisdiction over the claim or retaliation of the claim in its written statement in this regard and the defendant did not claim or dispose of the counterclaim, to the extent of such instruction. The decree was set aside, accordingly the appeal was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Samma Satta lawyer
