Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, the names of the defendants who did not appear in the FIR prosecution for any reason, without further reason, the identity of the accused conducting the test Failed to hold test id parade to set up. The parade would be even more important in this case when the names of the accused were not provided in the FIR, the testing parade could not be held simply because the accused who committed the robbery was later looted. Even though the provisions of section 103, the CCP, in its letter and spirit, fully complied with the Investigation Officer, the trial was to see the charges against the accused come under further inquiry, The accused was admitted on bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
