SHAHTAJ SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus G. A. JAHANGIR AND 2 OTHERS
RR 11 and 213 of the Central Excise Act (I of 1944), Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 claiming the return of excise duty to maintain a constitutional application to deny such claim by the Appeal and Reviewing Authority. And the absence of a remedy against the defective order listed in the review will not in itself constitute a constitutional petition. No constitutional petition could possibly be retained in the absence of factual facts, which were not indicated in the revoked decree. Yes, the constitutional request was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Tarbela lawyer
