Find a Lawyer

MESSRS CRYSTAL ENTERPRISES THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus MESSRS BOLAN BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT

Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), for reasons of section 99 debt recovery or suit of the plaintiffs, the Banking Court dismissed, concluded that the case could not proceed in the name of all the plaintiffs. To remain in one's name Despite many opportunities for the plaintiffs, the plaintiff failed to state the name of the prosecuting plaintiff, which was dismissed by the Banking Court due to a failure by which the legal status granted by the banking court There was a clear contradiction because the banking court on one hand had it. It was self-contending that he was not liable to dismiss the case either because of the reasons for the proceedings or because of the plaintiff's error, and on the other hand proceeded to dismiss the case on the basis that the plaintiff's decision was decided by means of banking and banking. Failed to process approved order. The court was set aside, the case was decided by the banking court for this decision, although the appeal was allowed registration advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer