GULMIR versus RAB NAWAZ
The plaintiffs who made the speculation and speculation of Sur-Q, making a Section 13 pre-trial case, alleged that two months and 18 days after confirming the change in sales, the informant told about it, while the plaintiff had two witnesses present. I was in his own house and he made it immediately and this notice was sent through a certified registered post of witnesses and the notice was sent, both courts denied the witnesses on the basis that the plaintiff's house Their presence is suspicious. The purpose of their presence and informant's arrival was not proven and the seller landed and the seller started cultivating it shortly after the purchase; it was unreliable that the plaintiff did not learn about the transfer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer