UMAR HAYAT versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND OTHERS
O XVI, R 1 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Demanding witnesses after a delay of 3/2 years The trial court summoned the witness presented by the plaintiff and by appeal Order retained. The use of constitutional jurisdiction as well as the use of a good cause trial court to summon any witness at any stage under the trial court O XVI, R 1 (2), CPC, by the High Court Was allowed to. The discretionary jurisdiction allowed the witnesses to be called to record the evidence, and the appellate court as well as the Supreme Court of the High Court also maintained the jurisdiction under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution. Refused to interfere with orders. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
