Find a Lawyer

MST. MAJEEDA AND OTHERS versus MST. GHULAM AISHA AND OTHERS

In the interest of the parties, the acquisition of the present findings of facts by the two existing courts of the Pakistan42 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), was in the interest of the parties and the plaintiffs claimed to own the extent of their share. Was. The appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs as to the legal heirs of the interests of their predecessors through the trial, and the judgment and order passed by the appellate court were upheld by the High Court in the second appeal. The plaintiffs failed to substantiate their claim that the witnesses did not support their finding that the defendants did not identify any illegal or legal weakness in the High Court-approved decision under which the Supreme. Court of Appeal for interference bail was denied top civil advocates from Diamer lawyer