Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD DIN (DECEASED) THROUGH MUJAHID HUSSAIN QASIM AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD AMIN AND OTHERS


Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in the interest of the plaintiff's two lawyers for the trial of the plaintiff, challenged the validity of the decree obtained after the death of the plaintiff while the witnesses appeared. That, in the presence of such decree, was approved. Relying on their evidence in the interest of the respondent trial court, it was concluded that such a decree was properly approved by the appellate court and the High Court has maintained such findings in the interest of the defendant. The predecessor did not challenge such a decree in his lifetime and the court dismissed the petition and refused leave.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Kotli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.