Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337f (v) Qatil Am, questioning the evidence was questionable, was the evidence that was not believed to the extent of the four missing accomplices, who were also charged. ? Such accusations can only be considered to the extent of the accused in the shootings of the dead and injured. Such evidence can be believed only when it has been corroborated by some other independent evidence that any one of his accused has committed any crime. Weapons recovery was not affected. The point of view was to retrieve the rifle from the other suspect in pursuit of the joint disclosure of both the accused, and the crime scene obtained by the forensic science laboratory was not found by the police with the said rifle. The said rifle was a weapon of offense; in their statements under Section 342, the confession was not admissible in the evidence before the accused, the CCP denied their role in the incident. Only the investigating officers. The proposals to which the reply was based on his opinion were not credible even in the evidence. The accused were not charged for any particular purpose, no action was taken under Section 8787 and No 88, The CRPC did not initiate action against the accused. No fragment of any evidence was available on record such that he was acquitted in the circumstances to maintain the conviction.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
