TANVEER AHMAD KHAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
26, 7 and 20 of the Lahore High Court Notification No. 10218 / Yards 1VZ2 (A), promoted to the post of Deputy Registrar, dated 10 7 2009, (Lahore) Appointment of High Court Appointment or Development of Authorized Authority / Chief Justice For any person / officer scope printouts / respondents disqualified from the development plans of Chief Justice Appellant, who was the reader, was promoted to the post of Deputy Registrar (Lahore), An undisclosed promotion order was not submitted. Any reasons to suppress it. That despite being senior in promotions, it did not develop. That no objective criteria evolved for selection for the post of Deputy Registrar, therefore, the controversial ruling on discrimination promoted that due to their superior academic ability, they were preferred over the applicant, and That under R26 of the High Court. (Lahore) Establishment (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, Chief Justice Lahore High Court had unlimited powers to appoint and promote Appellate and Promotion High Court Correctional Service Officer, which shows that the developed and One of the appellants had the same educational qualifications, and this appellant was senior to some of the developers because the impeachment order failed to provide reasons why his service record and educational qualifications were equal to one of the promoters. If so, why was appellant fired? Why when it is said that the promotion was selected for promotion when there will be four other readers in the selection pool the recruitment under R7 of the High School (Lahore) Establishment (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules was ignored. Open, transparent and intelligent
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
