MST. MUMTAZ JEHAN AND 5 OTHERS versus GOVERNMENT OFF SINDH THROUGH SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONS, PAKISTAN SECRETARIAT, KARACHI AND 10 OTHERS
For the declaration and injunction the section 42 and 54 suit house jointly occupied by the four brothers / plaintiffs were issued a PTO in 1960 in the name of one of the four brothers and paid the price of the said house. Later, the PTD was the plaintiff in favor of the transfer, who had been in the possession of the suit house for the past 55 years and had the rights of occupation, after the house moved the plaintiff permanently, the defendant was available for permanent auction. Was not that good in time and the defendants filed after they got tired. His Procurement Before the other forums, the appellate court correctly ruled that after discussing all the points of the appellate court, which is true and stable, the request for review cannot be interrupted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Thatta lawyer