MAKORO versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (4) Bail, Further Investigation Grant The most important evidence in this case was that of the alleged victim, but in that case he was the accused. It was alleged that the affidavit filed with the victim was filed in the affidavit court, which was uncontrolled depending on the evidence of the complainant and his brother, whose names were transferred as accused in the second case. Were. All cases will require evidence at trial, but for the time being, at least in the background of these circumstances, a further investigation has emerged.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Depal Pur lawyer
