CHAUDHRI MUHAMMAD QASIM versus PRIME COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED
In order to defend the case, the defendants of the inability to enforce the agreement between the parties, sincere and excellent defense, asserted that there was an agreement between the bank and the lending company under which the bank gave the company Agree to provide guarantee and letter of credit facilities to enable. Defendants' complaint to their agreement with the Water and Power Development Authority that the bank had failed to provide guarantee and convenience as agreed upon by the parties thus preventing the Company from responding to the Water and Power Development Authority. Prevented from contracting with. , Denying liability for payment of bank's claim on the same basis, the High Court refused leave to defend the case and ruled that the loan facilities obtained by the company were not denied. Had the defendants been able to prove that the bank agreement was a breach of contract, thereby preventing the performance of the Water and Power Devil. Opportunity Authority Agreement, Only Defendants Will Successfully Resist Bank's Case Defendants raised a serious and strong defense and the bank was required to prove its case through regular trial and approved by the High Court. The order made was separated. And was granted leave to defend the defendants according to which the appeal was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
