Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR AND 6 OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF AND 26 OTHERS

Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R 34 Applicants have alleged that the defendants have approved the sale of certain land in their favor by the Revenue Authorities in favor of the applicants. Exclusion from the suit and is hereby prohibited. The case filed by the petitioners was decided by the trial court in their favor. The appellate court overturned the trial court's findings and the petitioner's request for review of the appeal was accepted; the applicant was obliged to present the village limber to prove the contents of the mutation, but since the petition The petitioner failed to present it, it was thought that he withheld the best evidence as the applicant also failed to produce sufficient evidence to prove the sale and on principles beyond any shadow of doubt. Applicants were required to consider the principles of consideration. Make your own destinations and don't take advantage of the shortage of respondents solicitors from Havelian lawyer