MST. RAZIA BIBI versus THE STATE
Sections 4, 10 (2) and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The applicant / alleged kidnapper and co-accused of the FIR dismissing the constitutional petition had entered into a marriage contract through a marriage contract, The concept was and they were living as husband and wife. And in the marriage, two children were born that the Petitioner did not support the prosecution's case and clearly stated that he had not been abducted, but he had freely agreed to the marriage contract with the co-accused What happened when her marriage contract was more than 18 years old, according to an age certificate issued by the Board of Doctors Petitioner, the circumstances of her marriage was a needle court and it cannot be said that she was adulterous The court will allow the termination of the FIR, as well as the trial pending before the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Miran Shah lawyer