Find a Lawyer

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MANAGER versus BAKHSH

The statements made in the case of Section 7 Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), S5 past and closed cases Chenab Cement Product (PLD 1996 LA 672) were not to be influenced by past matters and Nor was the decision / decree closed or ineffective. , Which was finalized, however, where the order passed by the Banking Tribunal was not challenged in the appeal but was raised only by a writ petition, after which it was dealt with. , The order passed by the Banking Tribunal will be considered in the past. And because of the decision of M / s Chenab Cement Product, the case was closed and finally when the order passed by the Banking Tribunal was challenged in the appeal and also through a writ petition, and it was later settled. The order will be approved by the banking tribunal. The past and closed cases will not be considered and will not be included in the scope of this decision and thus will be set aside as a decision and order under appeal. As such, it does not fall under the terms of the previous and closed cases after the decision was made, nor does it remain within the meaning and scope of the decision in the Chenab Cement product directory, and for rehabilitation the matter is considered separately. Which is pending before the new one. The decision of the Banking Court, established under section 5 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001, will be decided. famous supreme court advocate from Ali Chak lawyer