MUHAMMAD AKHTAR SHIRANI versus PUNJAB TEXT BOOK BOARD
Regulation 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980; Escaped The notice of the Supreme Court is because the applicant could not file a controversial statement on leave and his lawyer verbally addressed the question of discrimination, but did not entertain such material requirement. Based on what was presented before the High Court, it was concluded that the 304 employees of Punjab Text Book Board, who were still working, were recruited by Punjab Text Book Board Employees Service Regulations, Reg. Contrary to the number 11, the High Court's finding was not contradicted. Time for a civil hearing for leave to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Theing Jattan More lawyer
