MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus ZAFAR ABBAS
O. XXXVII and R2 (3), by dismissing the defendant's plea in favor of voting by way of trial, brought the case on the basis that the written statement was drafted immediately. The legal authority had the power to request the written statement and the written statement as false request or false quotations from the party or its lawyer will not refuse to take the court into consideration of this claim. Cannot file without permission. O XXXVII, R 2 (3), the CPC terms, therefore, it was considered unfair to treat the applicant's request in a written statement, as it was not drafted properly. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Bewal lawyer
