Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN AND ANOTHER

Section 44P Permanent Order Prohibition, Shamlat deh suit grant of distribution of land to the plaintiff was in possession of the defendant on the basis of an agreement the plaintiffs were forcibly expelled and the trial trial. Court dismissed. The trial and the judgment and the judgment were upheld by the appellate court. The Shamlat Diyas will be considered as owners until their distribution, unless the co-owners of the village have the right to evict the accused. The plaintiffs had no claim in the case of the Shamilat Diyas, because on their basis their sale was merely an agreement which did not create any right, title or interest in the property itself. Was rejected on Permanently ordered to evict and denied illegal and forcible occupation property advocates from Nawab Shah lawyer