Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus THE STATE


Section 244 (2) and 265F Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 336/334 L (ii) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition was heard on the basis of which the petition was sought. had gone. After the complainant recorded his statement, the petition was moved to seek the report on which the FIR was lodged, but he said that the trial trial magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge at the same time Dismissed that the report was neither affiliated with the report nor the same under Section 73 Cr PC, CRPC. A portion of the police file record and the judicial filing itself cannot be allowed to prosecute on the occasion of the litigation, which itself has shown that the basis for this is that the courts be treated fairly and properly. The provisions of Sections 244 and 265 were required. F, CR PC

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Chitral lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.