Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IDREES JAG versus MST. UNEZAH SHAHID


Section 24 Conventional Evidence (10 of 1984), Section 72 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 100 Second Appeal Agreement in which the evidence of a document is applied to the execution of relevant evidence by the courts under the relevant witnesses The findings emphasized that the suit was a contract to sell the land. The defendants were executed for a total consideration amount of Rs. 1,095,000, of which Rs. 110,000 was paid as of the time fixed for the completion of the contract. The defendant was paid Rs 700,000 11 8 through a receipt on 1990 and was then extended to 7 199 1993, the defendants refused to receive Rs 700,000 and alleged that the receipt There was a forged document in which the plaintiff presented minor evidence of receipt which was closely related to him and no independent witness was produced.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.